• Home
  • About
  • Blog
  • The Ship
  • Press & Reviews
  • Events
  • Contact

Antonia Honeywell

Writer

  • Blog
  • Publication & Beyond
    • Countdown To Publication
  • My Reading & Reviews
    • Baileys Prize 2015
    • Bailey’s Prize 2014
    • Man Booker Prize 2014
    • Man Booker Prize 2013
    • Other Reading
  • Any Other Business
    • Advent 2018
    • Advent 2016
You are here: Home / Blog / Harvest, Jim Crace

Harvest, Jim Crace

31st July 2013 By Rebecca Singerman-Knight Leave a Comment

A Novel of Beauty and Fire 

Set against the enclosure acts, when common lands were enclosed for the benefit of the landowner, Harvest tells the story of a small community in the process of destruction. Life in the village has always been predicated upon the inhabitants working together, sowing, harvesting, grazing their beasts, banging the heads of their children against the boundary stones so they’ll know where they belong. It’s a way of life anyone can join by building themselves a dwelling and lighting a fire there, as our narrator did a dozen years before the story begins. But the new Lord of the Manor has modern ideas. It’s going to be all about sheep now, and profit.

Our narrator, Walter Thirsk, although a member of the community, is something of an outsider (what the Irish community in the next novel on my list, The Spinning Heart, calls a ‘blow-in.’). This is amplified when his hand is badly burned in the novel’s opening scene – an arson attack on the manor house – preventing him from participating personally in the events that follow. Walter Thirsk (the reader never gets close enough to think of him more familiarly) knows who committed the arson, but somehow never challenges the convenient assumption that a trio of recent arrivals are to blame.

Jim Crace’s writing is rather beautiful. The village itself, with its precise topography and its sense of purpose, driven by the rhythms of the seasons, is a masterclass in the realisation of place. The impending threat to this way of life is all the more tangible for being understated. There is a sense of the inevitable in the loss of community in favour of the creation of individual wealth. Like the best historical fiction, Harvest has s a modern day resonance.

But I didn’t lose myself in it. One particular, highly significant, scene is related in great detail, despite the fact that the narrator wasn’t present. Later, the narrative relies on the fact that Walter Thirsk wasn’t there– but as Walter Thirsk is the reader’s only entry into the plot, the effect is distancing. Walter Thirsk keeps the reader at arm’s length throughout, and there is no payback for this. Unreliable characters can be contradictory, they can alienate the reader, they can withhold information – and all of this can be incredibly compelling. Coetzee does it in Disgrace, Faulks in Engleby, Tartt in The Secret History. But each of these novels has something that enfolds you even as it repels. There’s a consistent thread you can hold as the reader, like Ariadne’s silk in the labyrinth, as characters twist and turn in the telling of their tale. I didn’t find that thread in Harvest. Walter Thirsk contradicts himself too often. He offers an insight or interpretation, then acts inexplicably with no signposts for the reader. It’s disorientating and, at times, irritating. It’s as though the poetry of the language indicates a private party to which the reader can only be invited by suspending their desire to know what’s actually going on. We meet the minotaur at the end of Harvest, but are never really invited into the journey.

Perhaps I’m too much a part of the modern world of individual wealth and entitlement whose approach is so destructive to the village in Harvest. I want the time I spend reading to be rewarded by a journey beyond my own boundaries. I love it when I stop noticing how wonderful the writing is and start living the story. I love it when I close a novel feeling miserable that my time with the characters (admirable, unreliable, evil or otherwise) is done. I’m glad I read Harvest, and I hope to goodness Jim Crace doesn’t retire. But I never once stopped admiring the writing.

Filed Under: Blog, Man Booker Prize 2013, My Reading & Reviews

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Follow Antonia

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Latest Tweets

  • .@LostboxUK @tfl @tfllostproperty Left on a Santander bicycle, at the Chapel Street/Marylebone Lane station, near W… https://t.co/7QVJv93qkR 30th January 2023 10:01 am

Most Recent Posts

  • An invitation to my birthday 2nd May 2021
  • An alternative vigil for Sarah Everard 17th March 2021
  • Decompression Day 19th June 2019
  • Arriving in Entebbe 5th June 2019
  • Out of Office – Uganda 4th June 2019
  • Writing and failure 9th April 2019
  • Andy Murray Is Not Dead 11th January 2019
  • Day 24 24th December 2018
  • Day 23 23rd December 2018
  • Day 22 22nd December 2018

Categories

  • Blog
  • Publication & Beyond
    • Countdown To Publication
  • My Reading & Reviews
    • Baileys Prize 2015
    • Bailey’s Prize 2014
    • Man Booker Prize 2014
    • Man Booker Prize 2013
    • Other Reading
  • Any Other Business
    • Advent 2018
    • Advent 2016

Copyright © 2023 · Antonia Honeywell
Joanna Craig Website Design